Friday, February 16, 2007

USCIS Reminds Prospective Adoptive Parents of

New Chinese Government Requirements

WASHINGTON - U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) wants to
ensure that prospective adoptive parents are aware of the new rules for
intercountry
adoptions from China that go into effect on May 1, 2007.

The China Center for Adoption Affairs (CCAA) officially notified the U.S.
Embassy in Beijing on December 21, 2006 of the new rules and their effective
date.
The rules will significantly impact and limit parents interested in adopting
a child from China. Some of the new requirements relate to age, marital
status,
length of marriage, health and financial status. The CCAA has indicated they
will process cases under the current rules as long as the dossier is
submitted
before May 1, 2007.

Since any family who filed an Application for Advance Processing of Orphan
Petition (Form I-600A) before December 21, 2006 were unaware of the CCAA's
new
requirements, USCIS stands ready to assist these prospective adoptive
parents. USCIS offices will exercise discretion to expedite adjudication of
any

Form I-600A filed before December 21, 2006.

USCIS offices will also allow prospective adoptive parents to file a new
Form I-600A, with the appropriate filing fee, if their current approval
notice
(Forms I-171H or I-797C) expires before May 1, 2007. The agency will work to
expedite adjudication of those applications in order to meet the May 1
deadline.

Guatemala
The announcement concerning new adoption regulations that was to have been
made today, has been postponed.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Sperm Donor Father Ends His Anonymity - New York Times
The New York Times

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
February 14, 2007
Sperm Donor Father Ends His Anonymity
By
AMY HARMON

There is no established ritual for how an anonymous sperm donor should
contact his genetic children. But for Jeffrey Harrison, Valentine's Day
seemed as
good an occasion as any.

"It's a short life," he said, "and these children need to have some kind of
resolution. I thought I could send a little valentine, kind of, to everyone,
just saying hello."

Mr. Harrison had been thinking about getting in touch since reading in an
article in The New York Times 15 months ago that two teenagers whose mothers
had
used his sperm to conceive were looking for him. The headline, "Hello, I'm
Your Sister, Our Father Is Donor 150," made him choke on his coffee, said
Mr.
Harrison, who made $400 a month donating sperm under that number
twice-weekly during the late 1980s.

But California Cryobank, the sperm bank that had promised anonymity to its
customers and to Mr. Harrison, proved unresponsive to his repeated requests
for
assistance. Besides, he had misgivings. What if the girls were disappointed
by his humble circumstances?

Once one of the sperm bank's most-requested donors, with a profile that
described him as 6 foot and blue-eyed with interests in philosophy, music
and drama,
Mr. Harrison, 50, lives with his four dogs in a recreational vehicle near
the Venice section of Los Angeles.

"I make a meager living," Mr. Harrison said, taking care of dogs and doing
other odd jobs.

Still, he said he thought he could explain to the girls why he had taken an
unconventional life-path. Their grandfather was an
Ivy League
-educated retired financial executive, he would tell them; their grandmother
was a former volunteer president for the Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty
to Animals.

Six weeks ago, Mr. Harrison logged on to the Donor Sibling Registry, the Web
site devoted to facilitating connections between donor-conceived offspring,
where the two girls, Danielle P. and JoEllen M. had initially found each
other. Four more teenagers from his sperm samples had since surfaced, he saw
on
the logs.

How many could he handle, he wondered?

As Valentine's Day approached, though, Mr. Harrison resolved to get in touch
with them all.

Last Saturday night, Mr. Harrison e-mailed a picture of his birth
certificate to Wendy Kramer, the founder of the sibling registry, to confirm
his identity.
Several dozen donors have contacted offspring on the registry, Ms. Kramer
said, but none have been brave enough to come forward with such a large
group
of teenagers.

"You don't know what to expect," Ms. Kramer said. "How do we define this
family, and what are we to each other?"

Danielle and JoEllen called Mr. Harrison together the next day. The moment
that had preoccupied their fantasies for years began in a more prosaic
fashion
than they had anticipated. But they said they were not disappointed.

"The first thing he said was, 'Holy moly,' " said Danielle, 17, who has
spent several hours on the phone with Mr. Harrison in the last three days.
"He's
sort of a free spirit, and I don't care what career he has. I got to talk to
his dogs."

Mr. Harrison met a third daughter, Ryann M., in Los Angeles yesterday
afternoon. His other newfound offspring, who live in Colorado, Florida, New
York and
Pennsylvania, are busy marveling over their shared love of animals and the
distinctive forehead evident in the pictures he has e-mailed.

Copyright 2007
The New York Times Company

Message on Guatemala To Be Posted on Our Website

The following message on Guatemala is being posted on our website:

February 14, 2007

Guatemala Plans to Announce Protocol of Good Practices on February 16, 2007

The government of Guatemala has invited the U.S. Embassy to attend a
ceremony publicly announcing a "Protocol of Good Practices" on adoption on
Friday,
February 16. As details of the implementation of the Protocol become
available we will provide updated information.

Rumors that the U.S. Embassy is no longer accepting adoption cases are not
correct. The U.S. Embassy continues to process adoption cases as stipulated
under U.S. law and procedures.

The U.S. government supports efforts by the Guatemalan government to
increase protection of children and parents and a smooth transition to
implementation
of the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption for Guatemala.

Miriam's Comments: There are concerns that these new practices will affect
Guatemalan children in need of adoptive homes and the adoptive parents who
wish to adopt them, in a negative manner.

Monday, February 05, 2007

New Immigration fees for adoptive parents will go into effect on April 2,
2007.
I-600 and I-600A - $670
I-824 (change of Consulate for filing I-600A - $300
N-600 Citizenship application for adopted child - $420

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

The Mystery of the Chinese Baby Shortage - New York Times
The New York Times

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 23, 2007
Op-Ed Contributor
The Mystery of the Chinese Baby Shortage
By BETH NONTE RUSSELL

McLean, Va.

ACCORDING to a State Department report released this week, American citizens
adopted 6,493 children from China in 2006, a decline of 18 percent from the
previous year's total of 7,906. And yet, just over a month ago, this
newspaper reported that China had prepared strict new criteria for foreign
adoption
applications because the country claimed it lacked "available" babies to
meet the "spike" in demand.

China has always limited foreign adoptions, and it does not publish reliable
statistics on the number of children in its orphanages. So how is one to
know
whether the decrease in adoptions reflects a lack of supply or a lack of
demand?

In the week following the report on the new guidelines, more than one
bewildered person said to me, "But I thought there were lots of babies in
orphanages
in China!" My response was to helplessly reply, "So did I." My understanding
of this was based not on conjecture, but on having been to China twice to
adopt, having seen orphanages with my own eyes, and on research and other
eyewitness accounts. Many hundreds and perhaps thousands of orphanages
operate
in China, most of them full of girls.

According to a February 2005 report in The Weekend Standard, a Chinese
business newspaper, demographers in China found a ratio of 117 boys per 100
girls
under the age of 5 in the 2000 census. Thanks to China's one-child policy,
put into effect in 1979 in order to curb population growth, and a strong
cultural
preference for male children, this gender gap could result in as many as 60
million "missing" girls from the population by the end of the decade, enough
to alarm even Chinese officials.

And what happened to these girls? According to the International Planned
Parenthood Federation (a term that takes on a whole new meaning when
referring
to China), there are about seven million abortions in China per year, 70
percent of which are estimated to be of females. That adds up to around five
million
per year, or 50 million by the end of the decade; so where are the other 10
million girls? If even 10 percent end up in orphanages... well, you do the
math.

A few months ago, in a conversation with my friend Patrick Mason, executive
director of the International Adoption Center at INOVA Fairfax Hospital in
Virginia,
I confessed a growing fear: that China, the country from which my two
daughters were adopted, would sooner or later shut down its international
adoption
program. Dr. Mason immediately dismissed my concern, saying, "The number of
orphans is just too great."

And yet, I continued to wonder whether, as China increasingly asserts itself
on the world stage and prepares to host the 2008 Summer Olympics, allowing
Westerners to adopt thousands of infants each year would fit the image it
wanted to project. I suspect not, and China's new restrictions lead me to
believe
that national pride is more important than getting these children into
loving homes.

The issue of abandoned and institutionalized children remains a taboo
subject in China, a problem the government does not even acknowledge exists.
The impulse
to hide it seems to stem partly from embarrassment and partly from fear of
revealing the grave human rights abuses the one-child policy has produced;
surely,
watching a parade of well-off foreigners cart off thousands of babies would
make the Chinese authorities understandably uncomfortable.

But the answer is not to stop the foreigners from adopting; it is to put an
end to their reasons for doing so. My fondest hope, and the hope of
thousands
of parents who have adopted from China, is for all the orphanages there to
close because there are no more abandoned children to put in them. This will
be accomplished only when China decides that there is no economic or
political justification for the magnitude of suffering that has resulted
from the
one-child policy. The government must openly acknowledge the problem, in
part by publishing verifiable information about the status of its orphaned
children,
and take real steps to correct it. To do so would go a long way toward
building the international trust and respect China seems to want so badly.

China has announced the lifting of restrictions for foreign journalists in
preparation for the 2008 Olympics. Perhaps this will allow reporters to look
for answers to some basic questions: how many children are there in
institutions in China? If there is nothing to hide, why do visitors need
approval to
visit orphanages? Why are only certain orphanages allowed to participate in
the international adoption program, and what is going on in the ones that
are
not?

The Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, to which China and 69 other
countries are signatories, goes a long way toward ensuring against child
abduction
and trafficking; but it does not include provisions that would require
member countries to report such information as the number of children housed
in
institutions or the criteria used for selecting "suitable" children for
adoption.

The treaty states that "for the full and harmonious development of his or
her personality," each child should have the opportunity to grow up in a
"family
environment, in an atmosphere of happiness, love and understanding." Indeed,
it requires that each signatory take "as a matter of priority, appropriate
measures to enable the child to remain in the care of his or her family of
origin." One could argue that China's one-child policy directly violates the
treaty by ensuring that many children will not remain in the care of the
family but be relinquished to the care of the state.

Under the new Chinese adoption guidelines, the international adoption
celebrity Angelina Jolie could not adopt from China (she's not married, and
alas,
she and Brad have more than two divorces between them, which is a no-no);
nor could the actress Meg Ryan (again, not married). Another person who is
not
eligible is yours truly. My husband is over 50, so I would have to trade him
in, marry again, wait the required five years (another new rule) before
beginning
the adoption process, and by that time I would be sneaking up on 50 myself.

It is comforting to know that Madonna is still eligible, at least until she
turns 50, gets fat (the new regulations call for a body mass index of less
than
40), gets divorced or goes broke (anyone with a net worth of under $80,000
is excluded).

The Chinese have asserted that the demand for adoptions far exceeds the
number of babies it deems "available," based on criteria that have never
been made
public. We can only wonder how many babies will be left behind by Beijing's
new policies - perhaps spending their lives in institutions because of these
arbitrary and artificial limits.

Beth Nonte Russell is the author of the forthcoming "Forever Lily: An
Unexpected Mother's Journey to Adoption in China" and the co-founder of the
Golden
Phoenix Foundation.

Copyright 2007
The New York Times Company

Monday, January 15, 2007

Families who are trying to beat the May 1st deadline in China, should be
aware that new New York State rules concerning their criminal clearances
went into effect on January 11th. Fingerprint cards that were not
processed by that date will be returned to your home study agency along with
a duplicate fingerprint card that the state will be submitting to the FBI.
New York State criminal clearances will no longer be complete without an FBI
clearance as well. At present, New York State estimates that it will take
six to ten weeks for the FBI clearances to be completed. When new
technology arrives, in approximately two months, the FBI clearances will
take only 72 hours.

Because dossiers will have to arrive in China at the beginning of April in
order to be logged in by the CCAA by May 1, this new New York State
regulation may negatively affect you. Please be in touch with your home
study provider.

In City Ban, a Sign of Wealth and Its Discontents - New York Times
The New York Times

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 15, 2007
Guangzhou Journal
In City Ban, a Sign of Wealth and Its Discontents
By
JIM YARDLEY

GUANGZHOU, China, Jan. 11 - Guangzhou, the chaotic export capital in
southern China, appeared to hit a major Chinese milestone this month,
becoming the
country's first city to reach a per capita income of $10,000 - more than
five times the nationwide figure and a rough threshold for becoming a
"developed"
country.

But in a measure of just how problematic prosperity can be here, the city
will institute a ban on motorcycles and motorized bicycles on Monday, hoping
to
quell a crime wave that has been building to more than 100,000 offenses a
year.

The vehicles, the primary mode of transport for migrant workers clawing
their way up Guangzhou's economic ladder, are also favored by criminals who
have
terrorized the city in recent years, including a shocking case in late 2005,
when a woman had her hand cut off by a thief on a motorcycle. News accounts
concluded that motorcycle thieves were divided into gangs, including one
called the Hand Choppers.

"Crime will be a long-term problem in Guangzhou," said Peng Peng, director
of research management for the Guangzhou Academy of Social Sciences. "As
long
as there is a vast gap between the rich and poor in the city, Guangzhou will
suffer from crime."

The Communist Party is forever trying to focus the expectations of the
Chinese people on a better, if distant, future where everyone is more
affluent and
where China is a true modern nation. Yet cities like Guangzhou and nearby
Shenzhen, which have already begun to taste real prosperity, are learning
how
new wealth can bring new problems and not always solve the old ones. As
incomes have risen in Guangzhou, so have crime, traffic and inequality.

Inequality here is unquestionably stark between the 7.5 million registered
residents and the estimated 3.7 million migrants. This week, Guangzhou had
to
lower its per capita income figure to $7,800; the $10,000 level had been
calculated without including migrants, whose wages are notoriously low.

But public sympathy has limits, particularly since studies show that
migrants are responsible for much of the city's street crime. Most major
Chinese cities
feel very safe by American standards. Still, in Guangzhou, thefts, purse
snatching, robberies and muggings have become common. One 2006 poll found
that
only 20 percent of residents felt safe. Hawkers at one pedestrian overpass
in Tianhe District were selling switchblades and collapsible metal rods as
self-defense
weapons.

Last March, Zhang Guifang, a high-ranking Communist Party official in the
city, signaled a tougher stance when he encouraged police officers to open
fire
on crime suspects when necessary. The police subsequently shot five mugging
suspects, and crime seemed to slow down.

Recently, there has been talk, including by a high-ranking official in
Guangzhou's Communist Party, of capping the number of migrants allowed into
the city
as a means of curbing social problems. As yet, the city has not instituted
any restrictions, but the motorcycle ban has already forced thousands of
motorcycle
taxi riders to leave. Others have turned over their motorcycles and
motorized bicycles to government impound lots in exchange for modest cash
payments.

"It might be because Guangzhou is richer now," said Lin Mu, 50, a motorcycle
taxi driver, offering an explanation for the ban and then laughing at his
own
words. "There are no more poor people, so there is no room for motorcycles!
Everyone has millions and millions!"

Another migrant, who gave only his last name, Gong, idled his motorcycle
with other riders along a major thoroughfare in the city's Tianhe District.
"A
lot of people have left," said Mr. Gong, 40, his eyes darting in search of
customers as well as police officers. "We're just biding our time until the
final deadline on the 15th."

Mr. Gong said he migrated to Guangzhou five years ago from Hunan Province.
He had earned about $250 a month on his motorcycle - a healthy wage for a
migrant
- but now he said he was not certain what he would do.

"Oh, here they come, here they come!" he said, suddenly racing off as two
police officers approached on a motorbike. "Sorry, I've got to go."

Along Beijing Road, one of Guangzhou's most fashionable shopping boulevards,
random interviews found that nearly everyone had been robbed or knew someone
who had been. Maggie Qu, 20, who recently graduated from a local technical
college, said a thief stole her wallet and cellphone out of her purse two
months
ago. Her friend, Chen Jianguo, 21, expressed sympathy for migrants - "They
are Chinese, after all" - but he blamed them for the crime problem. "They do
bring crime," Mr. Chen said. "Unemployed people and uneducated people have
to make a living, so they may resort to crime."

He added: "There are too many of them coming, and there are not enough job
opportunities."

Of course, migrants are also responsible for performing the hard labor that
generates much of the city's economic output - just like elsewhere in China.
Ye Cunhuan migrated to Guangzhou from Hubei Province in 2003 and opened four
stores that sell motorized bicycles. These bikes, equipped with small
motors,
are popular for deliveries and also for people who cannot afford a
motorcycle. Now, Ms. Ye has had to close two stores and is facing ruin.

"This has been fatal to my business," she said.

She has responded by filing a lawsuit that claims the ban violates a
national law that establishes the legality of motorcycles and motorized
bicycles. The
case was heard last Monday, and she expects a verdict by March. Ms. Ye
scoffed at the idea that criminals used motorized bicycles, given their low
rate
of speed, and characterized the ban as an act of discrimination against
migrants and others with less money.

"They don't want to see any of the poor or any ugliness on the streets," Ms.
Ye said. "They want Guangzhou to be a city that attracts wealth and beauty
and is full of luxury cars."

Lin Yang contributed to this article.

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

New York Adoption Home Study Services

BEIJING, Jan. 3 (Xinhua) -- China's new adoption rules are not meant to restrict the number of foreigners who can adopt Chinese children, but to ensure that kids receive the best possible family care, according to an official with the Ministry of Civil Affairs.

Lu Ying, director of the China Center for Adoption Affairs (CCAA) under the ministry, explained that China now has far fewer children available for adoption by foreign couples.

"More domestic families have adopted children from our center in recent years and economic and social development has meant that fewer children have
been abandoned or orphaned," Lu said.

According to international conventions, preference is given to domestic families rather than foreign couples.

The number of foreigners applying to adopt a child in China has increased, and they usually have to wait 14 to 15 months, Lu said.

"The new rules will help shorten waiting time for qualified foreigners and speed up the process for children, especially the disabled, so that
they can go to their new families, where they can get better education and medical treatment, more quickly," he said.

The rules have been made in the interests of the children, to guarantee them optimal family conditions, he said.

The new rules, to take effect on May 1, 2007, make it more difficult for overweight, single and economically precarious foreigners to adopt.
They give priority to stable, well-off foreign couples aged between 30 and 50.

Reports by foreign media said the new rules were aimed at curbing the number of foreigners who can adopt Chinese children.

Xing Kaimin, a CCAA official, denied this, saying that the new criteria were meant to protect children's interests and not to show prejudice
against less qualified applicants, who can still apply.

Obese people, for example, are more likely to suffer from disease and might have a shorter life expectancy, which is not without consequence for
the life of the adopted child, China Daily quoted Xing as saying.

Other criteria state that the applicant couple must have been married for at least two years, and those who were divorced must have remarried at least five years previously.

The current law allows single foreigners to adopt Chinese children, but requires the father to be at least 40 years older than the adopted girl.

A new requirement states that adopters must have less than four children.

The new rules will provide a reference for foreign adoption agencies, which can offer preferential arrangements for qualified families and
improve efficiency, Lu said.

More than 100 licensed adoption agencies in 16 countries have been informed of the revisions.

But Lu said the priority criteria might be modified over time.

More than 50,000 Chinese children are reported to have been adopted by foreigners in the past 10 years, with 80 percent of them going to U.S.
families.


About 8,000 Chinese children were adopted by U.S. families last year. The figure was 5,000 in 2001.

Monday, January 01, 2007

Transracial Adoptions Evoke Heartfelt Responses
Work on Emotional Topic Brings Personal Stories From Others
Commentary by HARI SREENIVASAN

Feb. 28, 2005 - - There are certain moments when sharing pieces of
information can elicit much more than a response and, for me, telling people
that I was
working on a piece about transracial adoptions was a series of such moments.

One co-worker told me about the challenges and internal struggles she and
her family went through when deciding to adopt. Another said he was adopted
and
told me about his personal journey in finding out about his birth parents
and the impact it has had on the relationships with the parents who have
raised
him. These aren't the type of conversations that flow freely in newsrooms.

When some of my friends heard I was working on this piece, their curiosity
was piqued by the race factor. The topic quickly started a debate about the
state
of racism in the United States vs. other countries, and the cultural
identity dilemmas that transracial adoptees could face. These conversations
are ones
that members of the adoption community are still having, some quietly, some
loudly.

Our piece focused on a few of the elements that enable transracial adoptions
in the United States and examined the situation of black babies from the
United
States being adopted in countries like Canada or Germany.

Transracial adoption basically means parents of one race or ethnicity
adopting children of another race or ethnicity.

My producer, Nils Kongshaug, and I visited a white family in Canada who had
just successfully adopted Ethan, a beautiful, bouncing baby boy in every
sense
of the phrase. We sat down with Phil Bertelsen, an African-American
filmmaker who had grown up an adopted child in a white family, and talked
about the
unanswered questions that forced him to make a film about the subject.

Contributing to the story were representatives from adoption link , an
agency in Chicago that specializes in placing black children into adopted
families,
and Bridge Communications, a firm that helps prepare prospective parents for
the transracial adoption process.

There are several different factors that have created the reality of black
children being placed overseas with white families and, in no particular
order,
they are: The dearth of black families in the United States in line to
adopt; the fears adoptive parents of other races have that they won't be
able to
bear the challenges of raising a black child; ignorance or racism; wishes of
the birth mothers that their children be raised in a less-prejudiced society
than the United States; and the demand created by overseas parents who are
looking to adopt and find a supply of black babies in the United States.

Watching Bertelsen's film, "Outside Looking In," is a good primer to the
layers of complexity involved in these adoptions. On the one hand, there is
the
idealism of loving, prospective parents for whom race truly might not matter
when they adopt a child. On the other hand, there is also something to be
said for giving children a sense of their own cultural heritage and
preparing them for a world where race is still an issue.

In 1972, the National Association of Black Social Workers called the idea of
placing black babies into white families "cultural genocide." Though it
hasn't
made pronouncements as strongly since, the group still thinks it's a good
idea to keep black children with black families. A recent law made it a
crime
to consider race as a factor when it comes to adoption and that's one of the
reasons children of all races in the United States are available to
prospective
parents of all races.

There are several great online resources if you want to learn more about
transracial adoption. They include:

Adoption.com: http://transracial.adoption.com/

AdoptiveFamilies.com:
http://www.adoptivefamilies.com/transracial-adoption.php

About.com on race relations:
http://racerelations.about.com/cs/raceandadoption/

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Administration for Children &
Families: http://naic.acf.hhs.gov/pubs/f_trans.cfm

Statement from NABSW on transracial adoptions:
http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~adoption/archive/NabswTRA.htm

About.com on NABSW's statement:
http://racerelations.about.com/library/weekly/aa121700a.htm

Interracial Voice: http://www.webcom.com/~intvoice/point19.html

African American Adoptions Online:
http://www.africanamericanadoptionsonline.com/

Copyright © 2007 ABC News Internet Ventures

Born in America, adopted abroad | csmonitor.com

csmonitor.com - The Christian Science Monitor Online
from the October 27, 2004 edition -
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1027/p11s01-lifp.html
Born in America, adopted abroad
African-American babies are going to parents overseas even as US couples
adopt children from other countries

By Dawn Davenport | Contributor to The Christian Science Monitor

Adrian Stokkeland, a 2-year-old in Canada, dances with his mom to the music
of Elvis and sleeps with his most treasured possession, a box of toy cars.
Emma
Sonnenschein, an energetic 19-month-old in Germany, loves to "help" her mom
around the house. Elisa van Meurs, a 5-year-old in the Netherlands, is a
real
girly-girl. Her favorite outfit is a Minnie Mouse dress, paired with a Snow
White tiara and pink Barbie shoes.

Adrian, Emma, and Elisa have more in common than their charm and being the
apple of their parents' eyes. All are black children born in the United
States
and adopted as infants by parents in other countries.

They also are representatives of a little-known trend: At the same time the
US is "importing" increasing numbers of adoptive children from Russia,
China,
and Guatemala, it is "exporting" black babies to be adopted in other
countries.

Since 1995, US State Department records indicate that international
adoptions by Americans have increased more than 140 percent. Couples often
cite the
lack of American babies as the reason for adopting from abroad.

But the US is now the fourth largest "supplier" of babies for adoption to
Canada. Adoption by Shepherd Care, an agency in Hollywood, Fla., places 90
percent
of its African-American babies in Canada. One-third of the children placed
through Adoption-Link in Chicago, which specializes in adoptions for black
babies,
go to people from other countries.

The exact numbers are not available, but interviews with adoption agencies
and families in Canada, Germany, France, and the Netherlands indicate that
the
US also sends babies to those four countries as well as Belgium and England.
Most of the children are black newborns. Most of the adoptingparents are
Caucasian.

Why is it happening?

There is no simple explanation for why many white Americans prefer to adopt
from abroad rather than adopt the available black babies at home. Racism is
one reason, says Cheryl Kinnaird of Adoption-Link in Chicago. But there are
others, she adds.

Families might choose an international adoption because of an affinity for a
particular country or a desire to help. Many couples want a child who
resembles
them so that their family will not stand out as an "adoptive family." Since
most adoptive families are Caucasian, this might explain the rise in
adoptions
from Russia and other eastern European countries.

In 2003, 37 percent of all international adoptions to the US were from
countries where the majority of children adopted were Caucasian.

White couples may also be concerned about how their extended family will
react to a black child. And they sometimes worry they are not up to the task
of
raising a black child in America and are not sure it is in the best interest
of the child to be raised in a white environment.

Then, too, whites often are uncertain whether they can provide the child
with cultural exposure to the African-American community.

Most adoption professionals agree that, all other things being equal, it is
best to place an African- American child with an African-American family.
The
National Association of Black Social Workers' position is that every effort
should be made to place children with families of the same race and culture.

Most, but not all, birth mothers agree, if they have the choice. However,
they do not often have the choice, since fewer African-American couples
apply
to adoption agencies. One reason is that babies are frequently available
within their extended family or community, and they have no need to go
through
the expense of an agency to adopt. Also, the number of infertile black
couples who can afford to adopt is simply not as large as the number of
black babies
available.

The word hasn't gotten out

Some speculate that African-American babies have lagged behind in adoption
rates because many Americans don't realize they're available. Media coverage
and popular culture have focused on Americans adopting internationally
rather than domestically.

"When we started to think about adoption, we thought only of international
adoption because that's all we were hearing about," says Lisa Malaquin-Prey
of
North Carolina, mother of an adopted Russian baby. "We thought it would cost
too much and that we would have to wait for a long time if we adopted
domestically."

"I think that more Americans would adopt these babies if they knew they were
available," says Stacy Hyer, a white American living in Germany with two
adopted
black children.

There is evidence of increasing adoption of black babies by white American
families. But ingrained preferences still play a part in who is chosen for
adoption.

The majority of couples seeking to adopt are white, but there aren't nearly
enough Caucasian babies available in the US to meet the demand. Although
exceptions
certainly exist, American parents generally prefer babies to toddlers, girls
to boys, and Caucasians to African-Americans, adoption professionals report.
Other ethnicities fall in between, depending on their skin color.
African-American boys are at the bottom of this "ranking" system, they say,
which is
why they're harder to place.

"We have to work much harder to find homes for our African-American babies,"
says Robert Springer of Christian Homes, an adoption agency in Texas.

No one is equating babies with commodities, but the principles of supply and
demand apply. Adoption costs and waiting times in the US vary depending on
a baby's ranking in the "desirability list."

The children who are in the greatest demand are also in the shortest supply.
Those who want to adopt healthy white babies in the US may wait as long as
five years, agencies say. In contrast, they add, the waiting for
African-Americans is often measured in weeks and months, especially for baby
boys.

The demand for biracial (black/white) babies falls in between, and the wait
reflects this. The waiting period for a biracial girl can be more than a
year.

It's also the case that adopting a white baby costs more than adopting a
black or biracial one.

Adoption fees for healthy Caucasian babies can be as high as $40,000,
according to the US Department of Health and Human Services. For biracial
babies,
the cost is about $18,000. For African-American newborns, it ranges from
$10,000 to $12,000, agencies say.

The costs to the adoption agency for each child also vary greatly, not
because of race but due to circumstances. The agency may have paid all the
prenatal
expenses and living costs for one birth mother, for instance, and not
another, who decided on adoption in her ninth month of pregnancy.

Why fees are less for black babies

But instead of passing along the actual costs to the new parents, many
adoption agencies - most of which are nonprofit - charge a set fee that is
determined
by how difficult the baby may be to place. The agencies say this enables
them to find homes for the children who are hardest to place.

Fees and waiting times for American families adopting internationally vary
by country, but total costs, including travel, are usually about $30,000,
with
a waiting time of nine to 18 months.

Because of regulations and laws in the country of origin, most of the
foreign children adopted from abroad by Americans are more than 1 year old
when they
arrive in the US.

In contrast, American babies can be adopted as soon as their parents
relinquish them.

Families in foreign countries cite the availability of newborns as the
primary reason they choose to adopt in the US. Canada and Europe don't have
as many
babies available for adoption. Therefore, "if you want a newborn, you go to
America, " says Bart van Meurs, Elisa's dad. Families also cite the health
of the babies, the short waiting time, and the availability of medical
records as additional advantages. Race is seldom a consideration.

"Most of our families just want a baby as young as possible, and the US is
the best place to go for a newborn," explainsLorneWelwood of Hope Adoption
Services
in Abbotsford, British Columbia. "They are not ignoring the race issues, but
they don't think, like the Americans, that the less black the better."

"The families from abroad do not think of black babies as being second best,
babies that they'll 'settle' for because white babies are hard to find,"
says
Ms. Kinnaird.

Most adoption agencies encourage the birth mother to select the adoptive
family for her child. Sometimes a black birth mother prefers having her
child adopted
overseas because she believes there is less prejudice there than in the US.

"Some birth mothers view placing their child abroad as a way for them to
have a better life with less struggle," says Joe Sica of Shepherd Care in
Hollywood,
Fla.

Long-term studies of black children adopted by white parents paint a picture
of well-adjusted children and teens strongly bonded to their families.

Tianna Broad, who's 12, readily fits into this picture. She's into makeup,
clothes, soccer, and horses, as are most of her friends in British Columbia.
"She's pretty much a typical Canadian teen," says her mother, Karen
Madeiros.

Most parents abroad report little prejudice against their adopted black
children. "Canada doesn't have the same race history as the US," notes Dawn
Stokkeland,
Adrian's Elvis-rocking mom. "There isn't the 'us' versus 'them' mentality
here."

There are also not the numbers of blacks in Canada. "In my son's elementary
school [in British Columbia], there are only eight blacks out of 450 kids
and
even fewer in my daughter's middle school," says Ms. Madeiros. "Most of the
blacks here are middle-class professionals, and our neighborhoods are
completely
integrated."

"For the most part Germans have very positive views of blacks - they see
them as singers, actors, and athletes - all positive images," explains Ms.
Hyer.
"My children are almost always accepted for who they are without any
expectation of who they should be because of the color of their skin."

"I think the main reason there is little prejudice against blacks in Germany
is because there are so few blacks here," says Peter Sonnenschein, father of
two black children.

That's not to say there are never problems. Some parents say their children
have encountered racism.

"Because Holland had many colonies, many [black] people live here and there
is prejudice against them," says van Meurs.

"Although my [12-year-old] daughter has never experienced any racism that I
know of, I can't say the same for my [10-year-old] son," says Madeiros.

Parents in Canada, Germany, and the Netherlands have formed support groups
to help their children develop a positive self-image.

Signs of change

While the news may be encouraging for African-American children adopted
abroad, there's evidence of change on the home front, too, as more white
Americans
look into adopting black babies.

Since the US doesn't keep statistics on private domestic adoptions, the
exact numbers of trans-racial adoptions are not known, but anecdotal
evidence abounds
of a shift toward black infants being placed with white American families.

"We can find homes for all our babies in the US, but there are regional
differences," notesRobert Springer of Christian Homes in Texas, who adds
that "many
families in the Northeast, Northwest, and Minnesota are eager to adopt
African-American babies."

Dick Van Deelen, with Adoption Associates in Michigan, reports that for the
first time in 35 years they have a list of white families waiting to adopt
black
babies.

In a twist to the import/export world of international adoption, "We are
thinking of looking to Africa to bring over more children to meet this
need," he
says.

Adoption-Link, in Chicago, also has a waiting list of families for black
babies.

"The younger generation that is now adopting is less prejudiced and more
open to becoming a mixed-race family," says Mr. Van Deelen.

Some say that the growing willingness of Americans to adopt US babies
regardless of skin color comes at a good time, since placement of American
babies
abroad may be threatened by new regulations.

The US is in the process of ratifying an international treaty on
international adoption. Although the regulations are not final, it is
expected that they
will make it harder for agencies to place American babies abroad.

But all the talk of adoption trends and prejudice fades in the day-to-day
existence of parenting after the child arrives.

Ms. Stokkeland sums up what most parents feel. After a particularly trying
day with a strong-willed 2-year-old, she sighs and says, "I wouldn't trade
[Adrian]
for the world. He is truly the child God wanted me to have."

The adoption was such a success that Stokkeland did it again. Earlier this
month, Adrian got a new little sister, as Claire Lisa, also
African-American,
came north from Georgia to join him and his mother in Canada. Stokkeland
says she couldn't feel more blessed.

Miriam's Comments: One of the reasons why more white Americans are adopting
transracially, is that legislative and procedural barriers to this kind of
adoption have lessened.